<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Notes: BlazeDS Revealed!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.crankybit.com/notes-blazeds-revealed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/notes-blazeds-revealed/</link>
	<description>Take a byte out of tech!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:54:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: prasanth</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/notes-blazeds-revealed/#comment-14678</link>
		<dc:creator>prasanth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/notes-blazeds-revealed/#comment-14678</guid>
		<description>Thanks, very informative.

i have a quick question can we use blazeds for flash remoting, from ur post i the answer is yes if so can u point me to an example of how we can do this. 

thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, very informative.</p>
<p>i have a quick question can we use blazeds for flash remoting, from ur post i the answer is yes if so can u point me to an example of how we can do this. </p>
<p>thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrenchTom</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/notes-blazeds-revealed/#comment-14495</link>
		<dc:creator>FrenchTom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/notes-blazeds-revealed/#comment-14495</guid>
		<description>Very good summary, Adobe is not very clear with these products.. 
You wrote that just difference between BlazeDS and LCDS is scalability and you are totaly right, blazeds data push is very .. dirty (It keeps a HTTP connection opened and stream AMF packets).

But, which is the best way to do .. a chat for exemple:
- Binary or XML socket (no HTTP tunneling)
- RTMP (need LCDS and what about http tunneling?)
- AMF streaming with BlazeDS (loss of scalability)
- AMF polling blazeds or event gateway of Coldfusion loss of scalability

So, which use??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good summary, Adobe is not very clear with these products..<br />
You wrote that just difference between BlazeDS and LCDS is scalability and you are totaly right, blazeds data push is very .. dirty (It keeps a HTTP connection opened and stream AMF packets).</p>
<p>But, which is the best way to do .. a chat for exemple:<br />
- Binary or XML socket (no HTTP tunneling)<br />
- RTMP (need LCDS and what about http tunneling?)<br />
- AMF streaming with BlazeDS (loss of scalability)<br />
- AMF polling blazeds or event gateway of Coldfusion loss of scalability</p>
<p>So, which use??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theo</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/notes-blazeds-revealed/#comment-13710</link>
		<dc:creator>Theo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/notes-blazeds-revealed/#comment-13710</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the summary. I missed the CF Meetup about BlazeDS and I have always wanted to get the 411 on that product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the summary. I missed the CF Meetup about BlazeDS and I have always wanted to get the 411 on that product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

