<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mac Pro vs. iMac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/</link>
	<description>Take a byte out of tech!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:39:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon JJ Buijs</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-113054</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon JJ Buijs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-113054</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m very interested in this question (Mac Pro or iMac) but the article is from May 2007. It&#039;s October 2011 now and today&#039;s Mac Pro and iMac models are totally different. How about an update of this article?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very interested in this question (Mac Pro or iMac) but the article is from May 2007. It&#8217;s October 2011 now and today&#8217;s Mac Pro and iMac models are totally different. How about an update of this article?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: computer repair</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-86179</link>
		<dc:creator>computer repair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-86179</guid>
		<description>I think youve created some actually interesting points.  Not too many people would in fact think about this the way you just did.  Im seriously impressed that theres so significantly about this subject thats been uncovered and you did it so nicely, with so considerably class.  Excellent one you, man!  Really fantastic stuff here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think youve created some actually interesting points.  Not too many people would in fact think about this the way you just did.  Im seriously impressed that theres so significantly about this subject thats been uncovered and you did it so nicely, with so considerably class.  Excellent one you, man!  Really fantastic stuff here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iMac Ram</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-71542</link>
		<dc:creator>iMac Ram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 02:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-71542</guid>
		<description>I just love the Imac screen as you mentioned, its a super sweet design. I just love how it looks!! Very clean and compact!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just love the Imac screen as you mentioned, its a super sweet design. I just love how it looks!! Very clean and compact!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iMac Ram</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-65324</link>
		<dc:creator>iMac Ram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 06:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-65324</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imacram.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;iMac Ram&lt;/a&gt;&#039;s web site had a lot of good specs on the new iMacs... its worth giving it a look... the new love of my life is on there, the new Quad-Core Intel core i7 with 32GB...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.imacram.net/" rel="nofollow">iMac Ram</a>&#8216;s web site had a lot of good specs on the new iMacs&#8230; its worth giving it a look&#8230; the new love of my life is on there, the new Quad-Core Intel core i7 with 32GB&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: online accessories store</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-63597</link>
		<dc:creator>online accessories store</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-63597</guid>
		<description>i dont quite agree with your points . but good post anyway</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont quite agree with your points . but good post anyway</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RealTime - Questions: "Is upgrading RAM or the Processor a better investment?"</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-63052</link>
		<dc:creator>RealTime - Questions: "Is upgrading RAM or the Processor a better investment?"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-63052</guid>
		<description>[...] vs. New: Real World Performance Over The Years – Computer Chips &amp; Hardware Technology &#124; Geek.com Cranky Bit &#187; Mac Pro vs. iMac HP Compaq releases the cq 50 139wm &#8211; Cheap n cool! My reviews &#171; Cafe Arjun &#8211; 15 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vs. New: Real World Performance Over The Years – Computer Chips &amp; Hardware Technology | Geek.com Cranky Bit &raquo; Mac Pro vs. iMac HP Compaq releases the cq 50 139wm &#8211; Cheap n cool! My reviews &laquo; Cafe Arjun &#8211; 15 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pc repair</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-59489</link>
		<dc:creator>pc repair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-59489</guid>
		<description>I’m still sticking with Mac Pro. It’s helped me put a whole movie together. I refuse to use anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m still sticking with Mac Pro. It’s helped me put a whole movie together. I refuse to use anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radio in america</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-56980</link>
		<dc:creator>radio in america</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-56980</guid>
		<description>It used to be that technology was at the level where for people like us to be satisfied with the machine, we had to get the pro level hardware. Now, technology has advanced to where even the consumer level products will satisfy what used to be the &quot;prosumer&quot;. 

I have no doubt that I would have been content with the performance from a MacBook versus my MacBook Pro. Maybe that&#039;s just me talking already having the Pro, but I can&#039;t help but thinking that I have a lot of power in this machine that I am not utilising - I might as well have gotten the MB and saved a few hundred bucks. 

Conversely, the MacBook Pro was the only machine to come in over 13&quot;, which I do not regret - I love my 15&quot; of space.

Too to consider is how frequently you buy machines. Yes, &lt;strong&gt;you&lt;/strong&gt; would be fine with an iMac, but what of people who buy machines only once every five years? Perhaps they do need that expandability of the Mac Pro (RAM, for instance, or higher end gfx, or the PCI slots - remember the parents actually used two of those for expansion when technology advanced and they needed the card to give the larger hard drive size capability) to carry them when technology advanced even (unbelievably) further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It used to be that technology was at the level where for people like us to be satisfied with the machine, we had to get the pro level hardware. Now, technology has advanced to where even the consumer level products will satisfy what used to be the &#8220;prosumer&#8221;. </p>
<p>I have no doubt that I would have been content with the performance from a MacBook versus my MacBook Pro. Maybe that&#8217;s just me talking already having the Pro, but I can&#8217;t help but thinking that I have a lot of power in this machine that I am not utilising &#8211; I might as well have gotten the MB and saved a few hundred bucks. </p>
<p>Conversely, the MacBook Pro was the only machine to come in over 13&#8243;, which I do not regret &#8211; I love my 15&#8243; of space.</p>
<p>Too to consider is how frequently you buy machines. Yes, <strong>you</strong> would be fine with an iMac, but what of people who buy machines only once every five years? Perhaps they do need that expandability of the Mac Pro (RAM, for instance, or higher end gfx, or the PCI slots &#8211; remember the parents actually used two of those for expansion when technology advanced and they needed the card to give the larger hard drive size capability) to carry them when technology advanced even (unbelievably) further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Trackbacks for Cranky Bit » Mac Pro vs. iMac [crankybit.com] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-36591</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Trackbacks for Cranky Bit » Mac Pro vs. iMac [crankybit.com] on Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-36591</guid>
		<description>[...] Cranky Bit » Mac Pro vs. iMac  blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac &#8211; view page &#8211; cached  At one point when the Mac Pro first came out, I drafted an article about why the Mac Pro was a better deal than the iMac for the poweruser home consumer. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cranky Bit » Mac Pro vs. iMac  blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac &ndash; view page &ndash; cached  At one point when the Mac Pro first came out, I drafted an article about why the Mac Pro was a better deal than the iMac for the poweruser home consumer. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-36338</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-36338</guid>
		<description>More upgradable, definitely. But you have to be putting some serious meat in your Mac Pro to make that extra money worth it. The advent of the 27&quot; iMac with quad-core just proves my point even more, like I said in my previous comment. You can get more than enough power and a great screen for much less than the Mac Pro route. When you&#039;re ready to upgrade, put the iMac on eBay, recoup a chunk of your money (as Macs hold their value well on eBay), and get a new one! If you do the math, you&#039;ll see you come out ahead with this approach.

Welcome to Macintosh, my friend...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More upgradable, definitely. But you have to be putting some serious meat in your Mac Pro to make that extra money worth it. The advent of the 27&#8243; iMac with quad-core just proves my point even more, like I said in my previous comment. You can get more than enough power and a great screen for much less than the Mac Pro route. When you&#8217;re ready to upgrade, put the iMac on eBay, recoup a chunk of your money (as Macs hold their value well on eBay), and get a new one! If you do the math, you&#8217;ll see you come out ahead with this approach.</p>
<p>Welcome to Macintosh, my friend&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lwl</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-36337</link>
		<dc:creator>lwl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-36337</guid>
		<description>i was incredibly lucky to find this conversation. we have to cps....and im pretty sure iv decided to replace the whole thing with a mac.
i want to keep the computer about 8 or more years.
unless i spend 1700 more on a screen (or use this eight year old one)i wont have a mac pro.
but its upgradable...it just seem tougher
than an imac with the 27 inch screen.
what do you guys think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was incredibly lucky to find this conversation. we have to cps&#8230;.and im pretty sure iv decided to replace the whole thing with a mac.<br />
i want to keep the computer about 8 or more years.<br />
unless i spend 1700 more on a screen (or use this eight year old one)i wont have a mac pro.<br />
but its upgradable&#8230;it just seem tougher<br />
than an imac with the 27 inch screen.<br />
what do you guys think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-35773</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-35773</guid>
		<description>Jonathon: Amen. Thanks for your comments. I&#039;d like to add that the iMac has pushed the Mac Pro aside in an even greater way just this month of Oct &#039;09 with the advent of the quad-core iMac. Even the super-hungry poweruser can get quad-core satisfaction without having to give up the huge lump sum required for the Mac Pro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathon: Amen. Thanks for your comments. I&#8217;d like to add that the iMac has pushed the Mac Pro aside in an even greater way just this month of Oct &#8217;09 with the advent of the quad-core iMac. Even the super-hungry poweruser can get quad-core satisfaction without having to give up the huge lump sum required for the Mac Pro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnathan</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-35772</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-35772</guid>
		<description>I have to go to the side of the iMac here. I personally just switched from the world of MS Windows to OSX. I am a web developer and many of my coherts were all using MacBook Pros. I have been doing this for about 15 years now and I just can&#039;t develop and do graphics on a laptop. I tried and hated it. I also however didn&#039;t want the clutter of a Mac Pro or any traditional desktop. I purchased a used Imac and maxed out the RAM to 6GB. I am very happy and feel very satifised with this purchase. When I am ready to go up then I can just sell this machine and put it towards the purchase of a new Mac. I will have to say I believe the iMac is more than sufficient for even a poweruser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to go to the side of the iMac here. I personally just switched from the world of MS Windows to OSX. I am a web developer and many of my coherts were all using MacBook Pros. I have been doing this for about 15 years now and I just can&#8217;t develop and do graphics on a laptop. I tried and hated it. I also however didn&#8217;t want the clutter of a Mac Pro or any traditional desktop. I purchased a used Imac and maxed out the RAM to 6GB. I am very happy and feel very satifised with this purchase. When I am ready to go up then I can just sell this machine and put it towards the purchase of a new Mac. I will have to say I believe the iMac is more than sufficient for even a poweruser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-34827</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 20:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-34827</guid>
		<description>Norm: Differing viewpoints are always welcome!

First, recognize that this article was written way before Snow Leopard (in fact, I think it was written when Tiger was out). We are only just beginning to benefit from multicore computing in a large way. 

Second, I get the upgradeability mindset. You&#039;re talking to someone who upgraded the heck out of a G4 QuickSilver (see &lt;a href=&quot;/push-your-g4-to-2ghz/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;).  But the G5 and Intel Mac Pros don&#039;t seem to have as much upgrade potential in the community as the G4. I almost would rather build my tower and go the Hackintosh route if I was going to have a tower that could be tweaked to the max. 

RAM is indeed becoming increasingly important for a variety of prosumer tasks, but I still see the iMac&#039;s limits meeting those needs.

The Mac Pro rocks. My parents have one and I occasionally help them with it, and we&#039;ve done some awesome things with it. I just feel the iMac has grown to the point that makes it much more difficult to justify &quot;needing&quot; to pay the Mac Pro&#039;s hefty price tag. 

Just differing thoughts. Thx for your comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norm: Differing viewpoints are always welcome!</p>
<p>First, recognize that this article was written way before Snow Leopard (in fact, I think it was written when Tiger was out). We are only just beginning to benefit from multicore computing in a large way. </p>
<p>Second, I get the upgradeability mindset. You&#8217;re talking to someone who upgraded the heck out of a G4 QuickSilver (see <a href="/push-your-g4-to-2ghz/" rel="nofollow">here</a>).  But the G5 and Intel Mac Pros don&#8217;t seem to have as much upgrade potential in the community as the G4. I almost would rather build my tower and go the Hackintosh route if I was going to have a tower that could be tweaked to the max. </p>
<p>RAM is indeed becoming increasingly important for a variety of prosumer tasks, but I still see the iMac&#8217;s limits meeting those needs.</p>
<p>The Mac Pro rocks. My parents have one and I occasionally help them with it, and we&#8217;ve done some awesome things with it. I just feel the iMac has grown to the point that makes it much more difficult to justify &#8220;needing&#8221; to pay the Mac Pro&#8217;s hefty price tag. </p>
<p>Just differing thoughts. Thx for your comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-34707</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-34707</guid>
		<description>Probably beating a dead horse at this point, I just cant help myself... It all depends on what you plan on doing. Does snow leopard take advantage of the additional cores? You betcha. Do you ever plan on upgrading components? You cant with the iMac (besides 2 memory dimms and a hard drive) I am a huge fan of my apple products...One thing that always bothered me was that I could never &quot;upgrade&quot; components like I could on non-apple hardware. 

Sure, I could max out my 1st generation macbook pro to a whopping 2GB of RAM and replace the tired 100GB 5400 RPM with a much larger 7200RPM version... but that is it. No CPU upgrades, no additional RAM supported. I cant buy a logic board that will fit the chassis, the processors are soldered...you see my point? Hard drive and RAM are the only things you can replace. At least with a mac pro, you CAN replace the entire logic board if you want, you can pop in newer processors, you can continue to upgrade RAM beyond what is considered sufficient the year you bought it. Lets face it, a prosumer doesnt just play video games and encode audio. They use software that is RAM intensive (photoshop for example), they have many programs running simultanesously and you are comparing apples to oranges.

This prosumer would take a shiny new mac pro and probably skimp on a monitor until my rebate check came in. One makes a wonderful all-in-one home office computer and the other is a professional computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably beating a dead horse at this point, I just cant help myself&#8230; It all depends on what you plan on doing. Does snow leopard take advantage of the additional cores? You betcha. Do you ever plan on upgrading components? You cant with the iMac (besides 2 memory dimms and a hard drive) I am a huge fan of my apple products&#8230;One thing that always bothered me was that I could never &#8220;upgrade&#8221; components like I could on non-apple hardware. </p>
<p>Sure, I could max out my 1st generation macbook pro to a whopping 2GB of RAM and replace the tired 100GB 5400 RPM with a much larger 7200RPM version&#8230; but that is it. No CPU upgrades, no additional RAM supported. I cant buy a logic board that will fit the chassis, the processors are soldered&#8230;you see my point? Hard drive and RAM are the only things you can replace. At least with a mac pro, you CAN replace the entire logic board if you want, you can pop in newer processors, you can continue to upgrade RAM beyond what is considered sufficient the year you bought it. Lets face it, a prosumer doesnt just play video games and encode audio. They use software that is RAM intensive (photoshop for example), they have many programs running simultanesously and you are comparing apples to oranges.</p>
<p>This prosumer would take a shiny new mac pro and probably skimp on a monitor until my rebate check came in. One makes a wonderful all-in-one home office computer and the other is a professional computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eisengigant</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-31840</link>
		<dc:creator>Eisengigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-31840</guid>
		<description>Well I am in the same position here at the moment. I could settle for a pro, or change my current setup (iMac at 2,16ghz) meaning that I add a nice 24&quot; Dell. 

The difference is seconds. Exporting videos to your phone was never that fast. Image rendering takes, let&#039;s be optimistic, 10 seconds less. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s worth shelling the 2200 € here in my place. I always wanted to have that silver beast of a machine, but thinking about it, I can&#039;t just shell away that much.

Thanks for the article. I am stopping myself now every day from walking out of the store with a huge box. Gee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I am in the same position here at the moment. I could settle for a pro, or change my current setup (iMac at 2,16ghz) meaning that I add a nice 24&#8243; Dell. </p>
<p>The difference is seconds. Exporting videos to your phone was never that fast. Image rendering takes, let&#8217;s be optimistic, 10 seconds less. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s worth shelling the 2200 € here in my place. I always wanted to have that silver beast of a machine, but thinking about it, I can&#8217;t just shell away that much.</p>
<p>Thanks for the article. I am stopping myself now every day from walking out of the store with a huge box. Gee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-26830</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-26830</guid>
		<description>LOL! Thanks, Derek. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL! Thanks, Derek. <img src='http://blog.crankybit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-26825</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-26825</guid>
		<description>So far everyone who has replied has a name that starts with the letter J.  So I decided to end the trend by throwing in a D.  I like macs...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far everyone who has replied has a name that starts with the letter J.  So I decided to end the trend by throwing in a D.  I like macs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-26264</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 03:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-26264</guid>
		<description>James, unfortunately, the price difference between the Mac Pro and the iMac is just too huge to have &quot;saving money by upgrading it in the future&quot; work out. If you do the math, you can probably buy and sell an iMac 3 times over for the total cost of a Mac Pro. That is, of course, factoring in the benefit of reselling your iMac on, say, eBay, and Apple computers in general get a &lt;em&gt;good&lt;/em&gt; price on eBay, for their age, in comparison to other tech. 

So that means you can have a whole new computer 3 times for the same amount of money.. and its spread out over numerous years! You benefit all around.

As far as maintenance concerns for the iMacs.. Apple has the technology behind the compact nature of the iMac down real good.

Just thoughts. Obviously, my viewpoint is just one side of the coin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, unfortunately, the price difference between the Mac Pro and the iMac is just too huge to have &#8220;saving money by upgrading it in the future&#8221; work out. If you do the math, you can probably buy and sell an iMac 3 times over for the total cost of a Mac Pro. That is, of course, factoring in the benefit of reselling your iMac on, say, eBay, and Apple computers in general get a <em>good</em> price on eBay, for their age, in comparison to other tech. </p>
<p>So that means you can have a whole new computer 3 times for the same amount of money.. and its spread out over numerous years! You benefit all around.</p>
<p>As far as maintenance concerns for the iMacs.. Apple has the technology behind the compact nature of the iMac down real good.</p>
<p>Just thoughts. Obviously, my viewpoint is just one side of the coin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-26237</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/mac-pro-vs-imac/#comment-26237</guid>
		<description>At the moment I am looking to buy a new computer. My current ibook G4 has served me well but I am looking to make 3D games/animations/HD renderings and at 933MHz my ibook just doesn&#039;t cut it. 

I also agree with Jennifer, for those of us who don&#039;t or can&#039;t get a new computer every month we need a computer that can be upgraded. On another note just the design of the mac pro seems safer, what if something happens to the imac&#039;s insides and you can&#039;t afford coverage for it? with the mac pro you would at least have a slim chance of fixing it yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the moment I am looking to buy a new computer. My current ibook G4 has served me well but I am looking to make 3D games/animations/HD renderings and at 933MHz my ibook just doesn&#8217;t cut it. </p>
<p>I also agree with Jennifer, for those of us who don&#8217;t or can&#8217;t get a new computer every month we need a computer that can be upgraded. On another note just the design of the mac pro seems safer, what if something happens to the imac&#8217;s insides and you can&#8217;t afford coverage for it? with the mac pro you would at least have a slim chance of fixing it yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

