<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leave It To Apple To Bring Revision Control To The Masses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.crankybit.com/leave-it-to-apple-to-bring-revision-control-to-the-masses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/leave-it-to-apple-to-bring-revision-control-to-the-masses/</link>
	<description>Take a byte out of tech!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:54:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/leave-it-to-apple-to-bring-revision-control-to-the-masses/#comment-5087</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 19:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/leave-it-to-apple-to-bring-revision-control-to-the-masses/#comment-5087</guid>
		<description>Bear in mind, however, that this article was a &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; preliminary reaction to the Time Machine demo after the first preview of Leopard in August 2006. Since that time, things have become more clear.

At one point, everyone suspected that &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ZFS&lt;/a&gt; was actually Apple&#039;s answer to the technology behind Time Machine, since it is a very modern FS and has rapid snapshot support, &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; Apple apparently has limited support for ZFS in Leopard.

Now it appears that they have used multilinked file technology as an enhancement to HFS+ to do the heavy lifting behind Time Machine. Consider this article, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/10/12/road_to_mac_os_x_leopard_time_machine.html&amp;page=2&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Technology Behind Time Machine&lt;/a&gt;, by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.appleinsider.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AppleInsider&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bear in mind, however, that this article was a <em>very</em> preliminary reaction to the Time Machine demo after the first preview of Leopard in August 2006. Since that time, things have become more clear.</p>
<p>At one point, everyone suspected that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS" rel="nofollow">ZFS</a> was actually Apple&#8217;s answer to the technology behind Time Machine, since it is a very modern FS and has rapid snapshot support, <em>and</em> Apple apparently has limited support for ZFS in Leopard.</p>
<p>Now it appears that they have used multilinked file technology as an enhancement to HFS+ to do the heavy lifting behind Time Machine. Consider this article, <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/10/12/road_to_mac_os_x_leopard_time_machine.html&#038;page=2" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Technology Behind Time Machine</a>, by <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com" rel="nofollow">AppleInsider</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oh4real</title>
		<link>http://blog.crankybit.com/leave-it-to-apple-to-bring-revision-control-to-the-masses/#comment-4998</link>
		<dc:creator>oh4real</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crankybit.com/leave-it-to-apple-to-bring-revision-control-to-the-masses/#comment-4998</guid>
		<description>Bit late of reply, but I came across this today and wanted to say, well articulated.

I overheard Apple employees at lunch cafe talking and heard them say  &#039;Time Machine&#039; yesterday and I had no idea what it was.  

Then today: missed ANOTHER opportunity to buy Apple stock -&gt; Leopard stories -&gt; apple.com/macosx/leopard -&gt; Time Machine.

I just became a software developer this year when cheap Indian contractors weren&#039;t working out to make my vision a reality. I quickly discovered SVN and you are absolutely correct.

I turned windows &#039;Restore&#039; off 8 years ago in Windows 98/Me and it is the FIRST thing I do when I get new PC. Horrible implementation.

SVN running in background of my desktop OS, running everytime I hit save on ANY application file would be amazing.

And the preview at apple.com/macosx does make it look easy and fun to use.

You are also right, that most don&#039;t understand this.  Before learning SVN myself, I would think Restore and would write it off.

regards,
oh4real</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bit late of reply, but I came across this today and wanted to say, well articulated.</p>
<p>I overheard Apple employees at lunch cafe talking and heard them say  &#8216;Time Machine&#8217; yesterday and I had no idea what it was.  </p>
<p>Then today: missed ANOTHER opportunity to buy Apple stock -&gt; Leopard stories -&gt; apple.com/macosx/leopard -&gt; Time Machine.</p>
<p>I just became a software developer this year when cheap Indian contractors weren&#8217;t working out to make my vision a reality. I quickly discovered SVN and you are absolutely correct.</p>
<p>I turned windows &#8216;Restore&#8217; off 8 years ago in Windows 98/Me and it is the FIRST thing I do when I get new PC. Horrible implementation.</p>
<p>SVN running in background of my desktop OS, running everytime I hit save on ANY application file would be amazing.</p>
<p>And the preview at apple.com/macosx does make it look easy and fun to use.</p>
<p>You are also right, that most don&#8217;t understand this.  Before learning SVN myself, I would think Restore and would write it off.</p>
<p>regards,<br />
oh4real</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

